A second model grades the same blunt claim about LLMs
The identical description of language models put to a different assistant, which agrees more readily and calls the stochastic parrot framing basically correct.
Related
Is Gary Marcus 'plainly and clownishly wrong' about AI
Who is Gary Marcus, and is he 'plainly and clownishly wrong'? A layered answer separates his prediction track record from his underlying thesis.
LLM pricing calculator
Google, $0.0375, $0.15. Google, $0.075, $0.30. Google, $0.075, $0.30. Google, $0.10, $0.40. OpenAI, $0.10, $0.40. OpenAI, $0.15, $0.60. OpenAI, $0.40, $1.60.
Strategic LLM Selection for Complex Programming (2025)
A long-form markdown guide comparing Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, o3, and Grok on coding benchmarks and cost, with a decision matrix for picking models by task.
The difference between not designed to and does not
Asked to judge a blunt description of language models without nitpicking, it flags one overreach: not built to model the world versus not doing so at all.