Grading the 'Greatest Vaccine Debate in History'
Claude assesses a viral vaccine debate for logical rigor, personal attacks, and whether any of its six questions were actually resolved (none were).
Related
Bringing ethnomethodology to thinking-aloud research protocols
A compact reading list for applying ethnomethodology, the study of how people make sense of activity, to the practice of thinking-aloud research protocols.
A logical critique of Lawrence Krauss's A Universe from Nothing
Claude dissects Krauss's cosmology book, flagging equivocation on "nothing," circular reasoning, and the faith-based assumptions hiding in his physics.
A Rigorous Takedown of an Evolutionary Psychology Study
The assistant first summarizes a study linking evolutionary framing of male aggression to victim-blaming, then dissects its methodology for overreach.
A second model grades the same blunt claim about LLMs
The identical description of language models put to a different assistant, which agrees more readily and calls the stochastic parrot framing basically correct.