What scientific publishing looks like after AI peer review
Asked to imagine research without flattery, Claude sketches a future where papers become living objects and reputation attaches to claims, not authors.
Related
Chasing citation gaps in a landmark open-access study
Claude tracks down a widely cited 2018 open-access study, then hunts for related papers on Sci-Hub, DOI coverage, and citation advantage that it left uncited.
Is Gary Marcus 'plainly and clownishly wrong' about AI
Who is Gary Marcus, and is he 'plainly and clownishly wrong'? A layered answer separates his prediction track record from his underlying thesis.
The difference between not designed to and does not
Asked to judge a blunt description of language models without nitpicking, it flags one overreach: not built to model the world versus not doing so at all.
Why skilled readers don't need AI detectors, argued to its limit
A tight Socratic exchange argues skilled readers don't need AI detectors, then turns reflexive as the assistant audits its own hedging and rhetorical tics.