AI peer reviewers disagree wildly, all while claiming 100% sure
A data dive into an AI paper-review dataset finds reviewer bots that never agree with humans, then a second AI stress-tests and corrects the first analysis.
Related
Is Gary Marcus 'plainly and clownishly wrong' about AI
Who is Gary Marcus, and is he 'plainly and clownishly wrong'? A layered answer separates his prediction track record from his underlying thesis.
A 2024-2025 tour of migraine drug research
A digest of 2024-2025 migraine drug research spanning CGRP therapies, a dual-target compound, nerve blocks, gut microbiota links, and placebo response rates.
A confident band history that invents a viral hit along the way
A detailed rundown of a cult Michigan band gets the ties, albums and lineup right, then credits its singer with a viral song he never actually recorded.
A Curated Reading List on Exercise and Cancer Treatment
A collection of reviews, meta-analyses, and trials on how exercise affects cancer risk, treatment side effects, and recovery outcomes across cancer types.